The Dianetics Ideas

I could not ever before not wish to receive anything that comes to mind for you- if it was or else, I would not be sitting below with you, doing this. I not only might never have a problem, or not intend to hear something that comes to mind for you, but I'm completely anxious to know every idea, every idea, every image or feeling that emerges or shows up for you- don't ever think or else, and if for some factor you do, please just let me know! Occasionally, you may have an idea, and photo, concept or event turn up that does not seem to address the concern, or connect to it, yet nonetheless, always do tell me concerning it, and as we proceed, the significance will arise for you.


This is integral in the basis of processing, and the subject of this discussion: the fundamental functions of the therapist and the customer: The standard function of the therapist is, contrary to "conventional training", not to control, which implies to impose and/or hinder, however to rather function from the basis of EMPOWERING THE CLIENT.

In subjective processing, regardless of what was stated in one's training products, the cpu is not there "to control" the customer. As a matter of fact, the cpu exists to approve the customer the flexibility and undistracted emphasis to procedure and share what shows up, and what shows up is what arises when the client resolves the product that associates with their very own goals for the processing, and for their life.

An Unbiased View of Dianetics

John Mcmasters revealed this standard fact wonderfully well in one of his talks on Power handling, in which he explains exactly how he was asked what this "special propensity" was that he had for giving such fantastic sessions; he needed to think of that for a moment, and spotted that it was what he had not been doing, in addition to what he was doing: he wasn't examining, judging, computing, or actually, generating any kind of thoughts, allow alone spoken expressions, after offering the command and while waiting on the computer to complete their solution to their fulfillment; he was, merely and only, existing with the PC, and entirely interested.




The duty of the counselor, showed; that was his "special propensity". I have had my own experience which taught me this well, extremely early on in the video game. In 1982, having actually just recently completed my training and internship on New Era Dianetics, I was running this on a COMPUTER, and there was a factor in the session where (being a little bit wet behind the ears not yet having numerous hours under my belt as an expert auditor) the computer seemed to be "taking as well long" to reveal anything verbally after I provided him a command.


This key became the most beneficial payment that John ever made to the subject of therapy or bookkeeping (Dianetics). In my humble viewpoint, it is the best contribution that anybody has ever before made to these subjectsthe application is completely non-judgemental, non-evaluative, and lacking any type of idea, recommendations or opinion.no preconditioned schedule for individuals, or 'levels' that they have to do


In Scientology we prided ourselves on not reviewing for individuals. All that truly meant was that the auditor did not Vocally review for the PC in session.

About Dianetics

The Scientology Bridge is extremely evaluative and judgmentalAt first, we liquid chalked up the difference in outcomes to John's improvisational skills and experience. Nonetheless, upon further investigation, particular elements involved lightIt was not an issue of what he WAS doing that the various other professionals weren't, but instead what he WASN'T doing that they were.


Anyone that had ever seen John audit might not aid but see a distinct top quality in his auditing."The customer's standard function is to be there with the objective of moving in the direction of their spiritual objectives, and to easily and fully reveal and experience whatever shows up for them in responding explanation to the inquiries and carrying out the instructions in the processing.


This is something to procedure as required. Yet additionally, individuals often have prior experience and/or indoctrination in auditing/processing which, in some means, and to some extent, actually misguides them into attitudes, ideas and habits patterns that protect against the complete realization of these roles, and so they will often tend to hinder the expressing of what comes to mind, as in the examples provided above. * The first, and maybe primary examples of mis-indoctrination causing much this less than totally smooth and reliable sessions, can be located in particular elements of the training routines, or "TR's":"TR's" are usually a person's initial, or at the very least early, experience in Scientology, and while I will take place to describe what I view as the defects in principle and article source practice, nevertheless, have a tendency to be substantially restorative, done as they are provided (Hubbard urges that "TR's are not processing, they are educating", yet factually, they are both processing AND training)


There is no "flunking", and no denial of the truth of this being handling. The focus, as it must be, is on experiencing the various other individual's visibility.

A Biased View of Dianetics

I wait till the customer checks out me as if to claim "I'm done answering, over to you, what's following?" As long as the client is looking somewhere else than back at the therapist, they are still processing the concern or command. Keep in mind "a silent auditor invites itsa"; the customer is still processing, until their focus clearly goes back to the therapist.